The AI marketing platform to win in
AI searchChatGPTClaudeGeminiPerplexityMicrosoft CopilotGoogle AI Mode

It reads what the answer engines say about your business, and then acts on it. Prompts you care about are run on a schedule, and the answer text, the citations, the brands named and the queries the model searched on the way are all kept. Every domain those answers cite is sorted by who controls it: your own pages, your words published somewhere else, and the ones somebody else owns. That last band is the one a pitch can move, so those are the pages it writes to, from your own mailbox. It reports pages you can approach rather than a visibility score, because a score is a measurement and a cited page is a task.

Answer engine optimization is the work of getting your brand named, and your pages cited, when ChatGPT, Gemini, Google AI Overviews and the other assistants answer a buyer's question. Classic SEO earns a blue link; AEO earns a place inside the answer itself. In practice it means knowing what the engines say today, which pages they read to say it, and then changing those pages or earning new ones. Mentionry is the loop: the daily reading, the citations sorted by who controls them, and the pitches written for the ones you can earn.

AI visibility is how often, and how prominently, an answer engine names you when your buyers ask. Mentionry measures it as a visibility score (the share of tracked questions where you are named), share of voice against the competitors you name, and average position when named, per engine and per topic. Each number opens to the answers it was computed from, so it is a measurement you can audit rather than a figure over a black box.

They describe the same work from two angles. Generative engine optimization (GEO) is the older academic term for influencing what generative models produce. Answer engine optimization (AEO) is the industry term for the same thing aimed at the assistants people actually use to buy. Both come down to the same two questions Mentionry answers every day: what do the engines say, and which pages did they cite to say it.

It is the chat inside your account that knows your readings. Ask it which questions you lost this week, why a competitor is cited on a topic, or for a brief on the page that would change an answer, and it works from your own citations, prompts and knowledge base rather than from general knowledge. It writes landing pages, email templates, pitches and briefs into Documents, generates images and short video, sets up recurring jobs you can test and open run by run, and acts in 1,500+ connected apps. It stages; you approve. Parts of it are still being built and the feature page says which.

ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews on the trial and on Starter, read once a day per question, which is the cadence the engines' own answers move at. Enterprise adds Perplexity and Google AI Mode, which record today, and lists Microsoft Copilot, Claude, Grok and DeepSeek on the quote as their transports land. We do not sell an engine we cannot read, and the pricing page says which ones record.

No, and no tool can show you the part that matters. It starts recording the day you add a prompt. Brand-level mention history is for sale from the data vendors, but the answer text, the pages each answer cited and which competitors it named are only captured while the answer is being given. Anything claiming to reconstruct those for last quarter is reconstructing them.

Yes, once you approve each one. It writes three things: an email to a person, the contents of somebody else's form, and a reply once they answer. They go out from your own connected Gmail rather than from a Mentionry domain, so replies land in your inbox and the sending reputation you build is your own. It sends the pitch; it never places the link.

No. The connectors read public sources and need nothing from you. The only optional connection is your own Gmail, and that is only so drafts land somewhere useful instead of on a clipboard.

No. Paying for a link that passes ranking signals is a violation of Google's link spam policy, and the penalty lands on your site rather than on the seller's. Marketplaces are filtered out of every channel, and if a reply asks for payment for a link, the drafting refuses to write the response and says why.

Yes, and the first reading is the useful part rather than the discouraging one. A domain no answer names yet gets an answer sheet showing who is named instead and which pages those answers read, which is a list of the specific places that would have to mention you. There is nothing to mine on a new site and everything to earn, so that is a real starting point rather than a report full of rows you cannot use.

All three work, and none of them is automatic. HARO is running and emails its queries to subscribed sources for free. Source of Sources is Peter Shankman's own follow-up to HARO, also free, up to three emails a day, and there you reply straight to the journalist. Connectively is a separate platform you submit through. Mentionry does not read your mailbox and does not log into anybody's platform, so it does not pull those queries in on its own. Paste one in and it does the part that takes the time: it judges whether you can honestly answer it and writes the pitch. Source of Sources is worth reading its own rules on, because they are ours too: reply off topic once and you are removed, no appeals. That is exactly what the judging is for.