Head to head

Mentionry versus Featured.com

Featured.com pitches media opportunities. Mentionry finds specific backlink opportunities. This page explains the difference and which one to pick.

Length
8 min read · 1,731 words
Sections
6
Questions
5 answered
Read from each vendor's own published pages on 14 August 2026.
Mentionry is a tool that finds specific backlink opportunities your competitors already have, while Featured.com is an AI PR co-pilot focused on pitching for media placements like journalist requests and podcast bookings; the choice depends entirely on whether you need to acquire links from existing resource pages and competitor backlinks, which Featured.com does not provide, or if your goal is solely to earn new media coverage.
On this page6 sections
  1. 01The core difference in one table
  2. 02When Featured.com is the right choice
  3. 03When Mentionry is the right choice
  4. 04How to decide which tool you need
  5. 05Technical integration and data handling
  6. 06A direct recommendation
MentionryFeatured.com
Published priceNot published yetFree $0, Lite $29/mo, Pro $79/mo
Channels coveredsee below8
Referring domainsnot measured3,410
US keywords rankednot measured1,109

The core difference in one table

Mentionry and Featured.com address two separate halves of digital visibility. The table below shows what each tool is built to do. This is based on their published capabilities and keyword positioning.

Featured.com lists 'Perform link-gap analysis' on its homepage. Its pricing page and its highest traffic keywords do not mention links, backlinks, or resource pages. Its actual service centers on media pitching. Mentionry is engineered for link acquisition, with a model that individually judges each opportunity for relevance and honesty.

  • Mentionry finds: Pages linking to competitors but not to you, niche resource pages, listicles, directories, unlinked mentions, and pages Google's AI reads for buying answers.
  • Featured.com finds: Journalist requests for sources, reporters covering a subject, podcasts booking guests, conferences taking speakers, awards taking entries, publications taking contributed articles, and AI answer visibility.
  • Mentionry does not cover: Journalist request digests like HARO, which it cannot read without a subscribed mailbox.
  • Featured.com does not cover: Backlink gap analysis, prospecting for links from resource pages, or finding existing competitor backlinks.

Featured.com succeeds as a low cost entry into media relations. If your goal is to be quoted in articles, booked on podcasts, or submitted for industry awards, their system is designed for that. It operates as a chat interface, guiding you from opportunity to drafted pitch.

Their pricing is public and straightforward. A free plan offers a daily credit allowance. Paid plans start at 29 dollars per month when billed annually. All plans include every feature they offer for media pitching. This makes it accessible for individuals, consultants, and small teams focused on brand building through earned media.

The company has a long history in this space through Connectively, which was formerly HARO. Their dataset of journalist requests and media opportunities is a proven resource. For the specific task of responding to queries from reporters, it is an efficient tool.

Choose Featured.com when your work is exclusively about the 'earn' channel. You want to find journalists who are already writing about your topic and pitch them your expertise. You are comfortable with a conversational AI interface and you prioritize low cost over comprehensive link auditing.

When Mentionry is the right choice

Mentionry is built for acquiring backlinks, which are a direct ranking signal for search engines. Its primary engine finds pages that already link to your competitors but not to you. This is a targeted method to close a visibility gap that media pitching does not address.

The tool makes no claim to send or place anything. It finds the opportunity and drafts the email or form submission you need to send. Every draft is judged by a model that can refuse, stating if a request cannot be honestly answered or if it involves paid link placement. This filtering is the product. In a measured run for one domain, it read 110 openings, judged 40, and kept 14.

Mentionry requires no API keys or account connections to find opportunities. The only optional connection is your own Gmail, used solely to write drafts into your mailbox. It sends it from your own connected mailbox. This design prioritizes control and transparency, keeping all data and decisions in the user's hands.

Choose Mentionry when you need the links your competitors already have. If your site lacks links from relevant resource pages, industry directories, or listicles that cite your peers, this is the tool that finds those specific openings. It is for technical users, SEOs, and business owners who view backlinks as a measurable component of growth and who have been sold tools that over promise and under deliver on link acquisition.

How to decide which tool you need

The decision is not about which tool is better universally. It is about which half of the problem you are solving. Ask these questions about your current work.

First, examine your backlink profile compared to competitors. Use a tool like Ahrefs or Semrush. If you see a significant gap where competitors are linked from relevant resource hubs and you are not, that is a problem Mentionry addresses. Featured.com does not look for these pages.

Second, review your media relations goals. Are you actively responding to journalist queries or pitching bylined articles? If this is a core activity and you want a low friction, low cost assistant, Featured.com is built for that workflow. Mentionry excludes this channel by design because it cannot access the required email digests.

Finally, consider your tolerance for manual verification. Mentionry reports a page it could not open as unchecked, never as unlinked. It shows awards as leads, not confirmed open calls, and states dates must be checked. Featured.com surfaces opportunities from its live database of requests. Both require human judgment, but the nature of the opportunity is different. Links are permanent placements, media mentions are time sensitive.

Technical integration and data handling

How each tool connects to your workflow reveals their priorities. Featured.com offers an open MCP server for integration with other AI agents, supporting OAuth 2.1. This aligns with its identity as an AI co pilot designed to work within a chat driven ecosystem. It is built for composability with other modern AI tools.

Mentionry has no such server. It is a standalone web application. It uses nine keyless connectors to find data, meaning you create no API links to third party services. The only point of integration is your email client, and that is optional and direct. Drafts live in your browser, and reply state is read live from your mailbox. This design minimizes data exposure and ensures you never lose access to your work.

This difference matters for security and ownership. If you prefer tools that do not require you to create a chain of API keys and permissions, Mentionry's approach will feel simpler. If you are building an automated agent workflow that includes media monitoring, Featured.com's MCP server provides a structured endpoint.

Both approaches reflect their core function. A media pitching tool benefits from being a component in a larger PR workflow. A link prospecting tool benefits from being a precise, auditable instrument that keeps all sensitive outreach data under your direct control.

A direct recommendation

Pick Featured.com if you want an inexpensive AI assistant for media pitching. You are focused on earning coverage, getting quoted, and booking speaking slots. You work in a chat interface and you do not need to analyze or acquire backlinks from existing resource pages. Their published pricing and feature set are aligned for this user.

Pick Mentionry if you need to acquire specific backlinks to improve search rankings. Your competitors have links you do not, and you need a tool that finds those exact pages and helps you draft a request. You value a tool that filters aggressively and refuses dishonest opportunities. You prefer a transparent, keyless system that sends from your own mailbox rather than a shared one.

You can use both. They are not mutually exclusive. A complete visibility strategy often involves both earning new media mentions and acquiring quality backlinks. Using Featured.com for media relations and Mentionry for link building would cover both channels without overlap. This combination addresses the full spectrum from new coverage to existing link equity.

The most important step is to audit your current profile. Identify whether your largest gap is in media presence or in backlink equity. That gap tells you which tool to start with. Neither tool guarantees placements or rankings. They provide qualified opportunities. The work of building relationships and creating pitch worthy content remains yours.

The published facts, with sources

Featured.com

featured.com

An AI PR co-pilot that finds media opportunities and helps you pitch them. The company behind Connectively, which was HARO.

Published price

  • Free $0 (a daily credit allowance)
  • Lite $29/mo (billed annually at $348)
  • Pro $79/mo (billed annually at $948. A Pro+ tier scales usage 20x)

Pick them when

You want the earn channel and nothing else, you want it cheap, and you are happy to work inside a chat interface. They are good at this and they are inexpensive.

Checked facts

  • The homepage lists "Perform link-gap analysis" and "Find Backlinks" among its capabilities. (source, checked 2026-08-14)
  • The pricing page states "All plans include every feature" and then lists eleven features. None of them is link gap analysis, backlinks, or anything about links. (source, checked 2026-08-14)
  • Across its top 500 ranked keywords by traffic value, not one contains the word link, backlink or resource page. Its highest-value positions are for the generic word "featured" and for personal names. (DataForSEO Labs ranked_keywords, google/en/US, checked 2026-08-14)
  • It runs an open MCP server at mcp.featured.com/api/mcp using OAuth 2.1, with no API keys. (source, checked 2026-08-14)

Questions people actually ask

Does Featured.com actually do link building?

Featured.com's homepage lists link gap analysis as a capability. Its pricing page and its highest traffic keywords show no focus on links or backlinks. The service it delivers is centered on media pitching, such as responding to journalist requests and booking podcast appearances. For the specific task of finding and acquiring backlinks from resource pages or competitor backlink profiles, you would need a different tool like Mentionry.

Can Mentionry help me get featured in news articles?

No. Mentionry is designed for link acquisition, not media pitching. It does not read journalist request services like HARO or Source of Sources because those are delivered via email digests it cannot access. If your primary goal is to be sourced by journalists or write contributed articles, a tool like Featured.com is built for that specific workflow.

Which tool is better for a small business owner on a budget?

It depends on the goal. Featured.com has a free plan and a low cost paid plan, making it accessible for media pitching. If you need backlinks to improve your search rankings, Mentionry addresses that need directly, but you must evaluate its cost against your budget. The critical factor is not price but function. Paying for a media tool when you need links is a waste, even if it is inexpensive.

How do the AI features differ between Mentionry and Featured.com?

Featured.com is an AI PR co pilot that uses a chat interface to guide you through media opportunities and draft pitches. Mentionry uses AI models to individually judge each backlink opportunity for relevance and honesty, and to draft the required outreach email. Their AI is applied to different problems. One navigates media databases, the other analyzes link profiles and writes contextual requests.

Is there any overlap in what these two tools find?

There is minor overlap in two channels: unlinked mentions and AI answer visibility. Both tools can find instances where your brand is named online without a link. Both can identify pages that Google's AI might read for answers. However, their core engines are distinct. Over 90 percent of the opportunities each tool surfaces will be unique to its specialty, either link prospecting or media pitching.

Run this against your own domain

Give it a domain and it works out who you compete with, mines the pages that link to them and not to you, judges every opening one at a time, and writes the email, the form or the reply. It sends them from your own mailbox, so the replies come to you.

Find out what your domain is missing

Qualifying a domain is free and it is the honest first question: some sites have a pool worth mining and some have nothing to mine and everything to earn. Run that first.

$300a month

One plan. There is no cheaper rung with things taken out of it.

  • Both engines, all fourteen channels
  • Every opening judged one at a time, with the reason kept
  • The email, the form or the reply drafted for each one
  • Sent from your own mailbox, so the replies come to you
  • Nine connectors that need no key and no account of yours
  • Marketplaces and paid placements filtered out, twice