Featured.com Alternatives
You are looking for a Featured.com alternative because you need something the tool does not cover, or because you tried it and found a gap. This page lists the real options, states what each one is for, and tells you where it stops.
- Length
- 10 min read · 2,354 words
- Sections
- 8
- Questions
- 5 answered
On this page8 sections
Featured.com
featured.comAn AI PR co-pilot that finds media opportunities and helps you pitch them. The company behind Connectively, which was HARO.
Published price
- Free $0 (a daily credit allowance)
- Lite $29/mo (billed annually at $348)
- Pro $79/mo (billed annually at $948. A Pro+ tier scales usage 20x)
Pick them when
You want the earn channel and nothing else, you want it cheap, and you are happy to work inside a chat interface. They are good at this and they are inexpensive.
Checked facts
- The homepage lists "Perform link-gap analysis" and "Find Backlinks" among its capabilities. (source, checked 2026-08-14)
- The pricing page states "All plans include every feature" and then lists eleven features. None of them is link gap analysis, backlinks, or anything about links. (source, checked 2026-08-14)
- Across its top 500 ranked keywords by traffic value, not one contains the word link, backlink or resource page. Its highest-value positions are for the generic word "featured" and for personal names. (DataForSEO Labs ranked_keywords, google/en/US, checked 2026-08-14)
- It runs an open MCP server at mcp.featured.com/api/mcp using OAuth 2.1, with no API keys. (source, checked 2026-08-14)
Why look for an alternative to Featured.com
Featured.com is an AI PR co-pilot built on the foundation of Connectively, which was HARO. It finds media opportunities like journalist requests, podcast bookings, and speaking slots, then helps you pitch them through a chat interface. For that specific task, which the industry calls earned media, it is competent and inexpensive.
You would look elsewhere for one of two reasons. The first is a missing channel. Featured.com's homepage lists link gap analysis and finding backlinks among its capabilities. Its pricing page, which states all plans include every feature, does not list those capabilities. An analysis of its top 500 ranked keywords shows no traffic for terms about links, backlinks, or resource pages. If you need to find the pages that already link to your competitors, that is a different problem.
The second reason is a difference in how the work is done. Featured.com operates inside its own chat interface. Some people prefer that. Others want the outreach to run from their own email account, with their own domain and sending reputation, so that replies land in their own inbox thread. The choice between an all in one chat and your own connected mailbox is a matter of workflow, not quality.
HARO and Connectively
Help a Reporter Out, now operating under the Connectively brand, is the original journalist request service. It sends queries from reporters to a list of subscribed sources by email. It is free for sources to receive these digests.
This is a pure request feed. It covers journalist requests and nothing else. It does not find backlinks, prospect for resource pages, book podcast guests, or analyze AI answer visibility. Its strength is volume. It has the largest base of reporters of any request feed, which is the entire point of such a service.
The limitation is manual work. The queries arrive by email, so no external tool can pull them in automatically. You must read the digest and decide which queries to answer. If you want this feed to be one channel among several, and you do not want to read an email digest every morning, you would use a tool that can accept a pasted query.
- What it is: The original journalist request digest, free for sources.
- Published price: Free tier and paid tiers, check Connectively for current pricing.
- Covers: Journalist requests.
- Does not cover: Backlink gap analysis, link prospecting, resource page building, podcast guest booking, speaking opportunities, industry awards, AI answer visibility.
- Pick them when: Volume is your only goal and you want the largest reporter base.
- Pick an alternative when: You want the request feed judged and drafted alongside other channels without daily manual reading.
Qwoted
Qwoted is a source request marketplace that also maintains a reporter facing expert database. Journalists use it to find sources, which gives being listed in its database an inherent value that a scraping tool cannot reproduce.
Its model is tiered. The free Basic plan allows two pitches per month and applies a two hour response delay before your pitch is sent. The Pro plan costs 149 dollars per month for 35 pitches with no delay, and includes access to an events and awards database. In practice, the free tier's constraints make it a paid product.
The coverage is narrow. Qwoted handles journalist requests and has a database for industry awards. It does not address backlink gaps, link prospecting, resource pages, podcast bookings, or AI answer visibility. If your goal is primarily to be found by journalists rather than to conduct outreach, Qwoted's database is the reason to choose it.
- What it is: A source request marketplace with an expert database for journalists.
- Published price: Basic 0 dollars (2 pitches/month, 2 hour delay), Pro 149 dollars/month (35 pitches, no delay, events/awards database), Teams custom.
- Covers: Journalist requests, industry awards.
- Does not cover: Backlink gap analysis, link prospecting, resource page building, podcast guest booking, AI answer visibility.
- Pick them when: Inbound visibility in a journalist database matters more to you than outbound pitching.
- Pick an alternative when: The effective entry price is 149 dollars per month and you need coverage beyond request feeds.
SourceBottle
SourceBottle is a free call out board connecting journalists and bloggers to expert sources. Founded in 2009, it is strongest in Australian and New Zealand media. It is completely free for both journalists and sources, with optional paid upgrades for pitching.
Like HARO, it is a single channel tool. It covers journalist requests and does nothing else. There is no backlink analysis, prospecting, podcast booking, or AI visibility tracking. Its value is its niche dominance and its price.
It is not a tool you replace. It is a source you monitor. Mentionry, for example, reads SourceBottle as one of its inputs for the journalist requests channel. The choice is not between SourceBottle and another platform, but between reading it yourself and having a tool read it for you as part of a broader set of channels.
- What it is: A free call out board, strong in Australian media.
- Published price: Free 0 dollars, with optional paid pitching upgrades.
- Covers: Journalist requests.
- Does not cover: Backlink gap analysis, link prospecting, resource page building, podcast guest booking, speaking opportunities, industry awards, AI answer visibility.
- Pick them when: You need a free, effective service for Australian and New Zealand media.
- Pick an alternative when: You want its opportunities automatically judged and drafted alongside other channels without manual monitoring.
Respona
Respona has shifted from an outreach platform to a service that sells placements outright. Its pricing is per placement, with a guaranteed publisher Domain Rating. Prices range from 100 dollars for a placement on a DR 20 plus site to 500 dollars for DR 60 plus. The service includes content creation, outreach, and publishing, with the client choosing the anchor text and target URL.
This is a fundamental difference in model. Respona guarantees a link on a domain of a specified quality within 28 days. This transfers risk from the client to the vendor, but it introduces a different kind of risk.
Google's link spam policy explicitly treats buying links that pass ranking signals as a violation. The policy names exchanging money for links directly. The penalty for such a link scheme is applied to the site receiving the link, not the vendor placing it. Choosing Respona is a decision that this risk is acceptable in exchange for a guaranteed result.
- What it is: A service that sells guaranteed link placements per result.
- Published price: 100 dollars per placement (DR 20 plus), 160 dollars (DR 30 plus), 240 dollars (DR 40 plus), 400 dollars (DR 50 plus), 500 dollars (DR 60 plus).
- Covers: Outreach drafts, bylined articles (as part of the placement).
- Does not cover: Backlink gap analysis, journalist requests, podcast guest booking, AI answer visibility.
- Pick them when: You want a guaranteed placement on a specific tier of domain and accept the associated policy risk.
- Pick an alternative when: You believe paying per placement with control over anchor text violates search engine guidelines and poses a risk to your site.
Prowly
Prowly is a full public relations suite owned by Semrush. It provides a media database with contact records, press release hosting, pitching tools, and media monitoring. It is a different category of product from a focused pitching or link building tool.
Its coverage reflects this breadth. It can help you find journalists, respond to requests, monitor for unlinked mentions, and watch competitor coverage. It does not address the technical side of link acquisition, such as gap analysis, prospecting for resource pages, or booking podcast appearances.
The key distinction is in data freshness. Prowly's value is in its aggregated database. An alternative approach is to find reporters by reading the bylines on recent coverage of your subject, which yields contacts who are actively writing about the topic now, rather than relying on a database record that may be years old.
- What it is: A PR suite with media database, press room, and monitoring.
- Published price: Tiered, check vendor for current published tiers.
- Covers: Find journalists, journalist requests, unlinked mentions, competitor coverage watch.
- Does not cover: Backlink gap analysis, link prospecting, resource page building, podcast guest booking.
- Pick them when: You need a media database and a full press room, not just a pitching tool.
- Pick an alternative when: You want reporters identified from recent coverage rather than a static database.
Mentionry
Mentionry finds the specific pages that could give a business a backlink and writes the pitch to ask for it. You give it a domain. It identifies competitors and runs two engines. The Mine engine finds pages linking to competitors but not to you, plus resource pages and directories. The Earn engine finds journalist requests, reporters covering the subject, podcasts, conferences, awards, contributed article opportunities, unlinked mentions, and pages Google's AI reads for its overviews.
Every opportunity comes with a drafted email, form submission, or reply. The email is sent from the user's own connected mailbox, using their address, domain, and sending reputation. Replies land in a thread they own. The product measures results by verifying links after the fact, reporting what was earned rather than how many emails were sent.
Mentionry has specific gaps. It does not pull in HARO, Source of Sources, or Connectively queries automatically, as it does not read mailboxes or log into those platforms. Queries from those services must be pasted in. Its AI answer visibility channel covers Google AI Overviews only, not other AI assistants. It cannot place or publish a link, it only sends the pitch. Several channels are not built at all, including broken link building, registries, and relationship inventory. Its pricing is not yet published.
- What it is: A tool that finds link opportunities and drafts the pitch, sending from your mailbox.
- Published price: Not yet published.
- Covers: Backlink gap analysis, link prospecting, resource pages, journalist requests, find journalists, podcast guest booking, speaking opportunities, industry awards, bylined articles, AI answer visibility (Google Overviews only), unlinked mentions.
- Does not cover: Automatic HARO/Connectively ingestion, ChatGPT or Perplexity visibility, broken link building, registries, relationship inventory. It does not place or guarantee links.
- Pick them when: You need both the links your competitors have and the earned media opportunities, and you want pitches sent from your own email account.
- Pick an alternative when: You need automatic ingestion of HARO emails, visibility on non Google AI assistants, or a tool that guarantees placements.
How to choose an alternative
The choice depends on which half of the problem you are solving. If your goal is purely earned media, getting mentions and coverage in the press, then Featured.com, HARO, Qwoted, or SourceBottle are valid options. Your decision among them will be based on price, geographic focus, and whether you prefer a database or a request feed.
If your goal includes acquiring specific backlinks from existing pages like resource lists or competitor citations, then you need a tool that performs link gap analysis and prospecting. In this category, Mentionry is an option that combines both the mine and earn channels. Respona is an option if you redefine the problem as buying a guaranteed placement, accepting the associated risks.
Finally, consider how you want the work to happen. Do you want to work inside a vendor's chat interface, or do you want outreach to run from your own email? Do you want to manually review request digests, or have a tool judge relevance for you? Do you need a full media database, or just a way to find reporters on recent articles? Answering these workflow questions will eliminate most options and leave you with one or two to try.
Questions people actually ask
Is Featured.com good for getting backlinks?
Featured.com is built for earned media, which means getting coverage, mentions, and interviews. Its homepage mentions link related features, but its pricing page and keyword traffic analysis show this is not its primary focus. For finding specific pages that already link to your competitors, a dedicated link gap analysis tool is more appropriate.
What is the main difference between HARO and Featured.com?
HARO, now Connectively, is a pure journalist request feed sent by email. Featured.com is an AI co-pilot that includes that request feed alongside other earned media channels like podcast bookings and award submissions, all within a chat interface. Featured.com builds on the HARO foundation but operates as a different type of product.
Why does Mentionry not pull in HARO queries automatically?
HARO queries are sent to a subscribed source's email inbox. Mentionry does not read users' mailboxes or log into third party platforms for privacy and security reasons. You can paste a HARO query into Mentionry, and it will be judged and drafted like any other opportunity, but the ingestion step is manual.
Is it safe to use a service like Respona that guarantees link placements?
Google's link spam policy states that buying links that pass ranking signals is a violation. Services that charge per placement with client controlled anchor text and URLs fit this description. The penalty for such a link scheme is applied to the site receiving the link. Using such a service is a decision that accepts this risk in exchange for a guaranteed result.
How does Mentionry verify that its outreach actually worked?
After a pitch is sent, Mentionry checks back on the opening to see if a link appeared, on which page, with what anchor text, and whether it remains. A link that is later removed or turned nofollow is shown as a change in status. This reports what was earned, not just what was pitched.
Run this against your own domain
Give it a domain and it works out who you compete with, mines the pages that link to them and not to you, judges every opening one at a time, and writes the email, the form or the reply. It sends them from your own mailbox, so the replies come to you.
Find out what your domain is missing
Qualifying a domain is free and it is the honest first question: some sites have a pool worth mining and some have nothing to mine and everything to earn. Run that first.
One plan. There is no cheaper rung with things taken out of it.
- Both engines, all fourteen channels
- Every opening judged one at a time, with the reason kept
- The email, the form or the reply drafted for each one
- Sent from your own mailbox, so the replies come to you
- Nine connectors that need no key and no account of yours
- Marketplaces and paid placements filtered out, twice